Map the Logic of Your Research

A conceptual framework visually and narratively explains the key variables and relationships you will investigate. It connects your literature review to your research design and guides data analysis.

Unlike a theoretical framework that applies established theory, your conceptual framework is researcher-builtshowing exactly how you conceptualise the problem and its components.

Framework Structure Flow
Literature Review & Existing Theories
Identify Key Variables & Constructs
Hypotheses & Research Questions

Conceptual vs Theoretical Framework

Understanding the difference helps you choose the right approach for your study

Conceptual Framework

Researcher-Built Model

A researcher-constructed model that identifies variables and hypothesises relationships specific to your study context and research questions.

  • Created by the researcher from literature synthesis
  • Shows relationships between YOUR study variables
  • Study-specific and context-dependent
  • Often represented as a visual diagram
  • Directly guides data collection and analysis
Theoretical Framework

Established Theory Base

Draws on one or more existing, validated theories to provide the philosophical and analytical foundation for your research.

  • Derived from established academic theories
  • Provides the "lens" for interpreting findings
  • Validated by prior empirical research
  • Broader application across disciplines
  • May test, extend, or challenge the theory

How to Build Yours

Follow these five steps to develop a clear, logical conceptual framework for your study

Identify key concepts, variables, and relationships that prior research has established. Note contradictions, gaps, and unanswered questions that your study will address.

Clearly define your independent (predictor) variables, dependent (outcome) variables, and any mediating or moderating variables that influence the relationship.

Hypothesise how variables interact. Will the relationship be positive or negative? Direct or indirect? What mediating factors might exist?

Draw a diagram using boxes for variables and arrows for relationships. Use standard notation (→ for direct effects, dotted lines for moderating effects).

Describe each variable and hypothesised relationship in prose. Explain why you expect these relationships based on literature and logic.
Pro Tips
1

Keep your framework focused on 3-7 key variables. Too many variables become unmanageable and statistically problematic.

2

Use consistent terminology throughout your framework, hypotheses, and measurement instruments.

3

Test your framework logic with colleagues before finalising. If someone can't follow it, revise for clarity.

4

Align every research question with a specific relationship shown in your framework diagram.

5

Update your framework as your study evolves. It's a working model, not a fixed document.

Examples Across Disciplines

Illustrative variable relationships from different academic fields

Education
Student Motivation Framework

Examines how teaching style (IV) affects student engagement (Mediator) and academic performance (DV).

Business
Employee Productivity Model

Tests how leadership style and workplace environment jointly influence job satisfaction and productivity.

Healthcare
Patient Satisfaction Framework

Investigates how wait time and communication quality affect patient satisfaction and treatment adherence.

Technology
Technology Adoption Model

Applies UTAUT constructs: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence affecting adoption intention.